Evaluation of Bisphosphonate Coated Pins for Extern Fixation in Tibia Osteotomy (PFX)
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biphosfonate
Hydroxylapatit
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Pin fixation, Osteotomy, hemicallotasis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients which are diagnosed with arthr and needs an operation.
Sites / Locations
- Orthopeadic Clinic Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
External pins coated by biphosfonate.
External pins coated by hydroxylapatite.
Arm Description
External pins coated by biphosfonate.
External pins coated by hydroxylapatite.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
To evaluate the relative osseomechanical strength of a novel coated pin/screw in a clinical mode.
To evaluate the relative osseomechanical strength of a novel coated pin/screw
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01745276
First Posted
May 23, 2012
Last Updated
September 10, 2018
Sponsor
Region Skane
Collaborators
Addbio AB
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01745276
Brief Title
Evaluation of Bisphosphonate Coated Pins for Extern Fixation in Tibia Osteotomy
Acronym
PFX
Official Title
Evaluation of Bisphosphonate Coated Pins for Extern Fixation in Tibia Osteotomy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Region Skane
Collaborators
Addbio AB
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relative osseomechanical strength of a novel coated pin/screw in a clinical model.
Detailed Description
The pin fixation and the risk for pin loosening and pintract infection is intimately connected Moroni et al., Magyar et al. Toksvig-Larsen and W-Dahl) The pin performance ratio for insertion to extraction torque (PPI) varies significantly between screw types.
The extraction torque force is the most important value and it is estimated that a removal torque around 300 Nm probably will be the best bon-pin fixation in clinical practice.
In animal studies and even in clinical studies the hydroxyapatite (HA) coated screw retained the highest level of osseointegration. However, the fixation for HAscrews is, especially in diaphyseal bone, the risk for too tight fixation, with extreme difficulties to remove the screws in few cases as a result ( high pain and seldom it is impossible to remove the screw) Coating by biphosphonate is a new novel technique with preclinical appealing performance, which theoretically should make this coating very appealing in clinical practice. The theory behind this technique is that it create a good pinfixation reasonable easy to remove.
The current most used cortical screw designs performed poorest in terms of fixation (PPI)
Method
Using the hemicallotasis technique for correction in high tibial osteotomies today, HA coated (Osteotite) conical 130/50 screws is used in the proximal tibia - the metaphysic - and plain (standard) cortical conical screws 110/40 is used in the diaphysis.
To study the effect of an improved pin coating a study including 30 patients randomised to the standard procedure today or the novel technique using biphosphonate coated screws.
In the metaphysic, the randomisation will be between the HA coated (Osteotite) screws and the biphosphonated coated screws 130/50 (screw thread 50mm) In the diaphysis the randomisation will be between the plain standard 110/40 screws and the biphosphonate 110/40 coated screws
Totally 30 patients will be studied which means totally 120 pins. This has been based on power calculations resulting in 23 patients in each group and calculated on extraction torque force. This is a clinical study and 30 patients is estimated due to expected drop out.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Pin fixation, Osteotomy, hemicallotasis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
External pins coated by biphosfonate.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
External pins coated by biphosfonate.
Arm Title
External pins coated by hydroxylapatite.
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
External pins coated by hydroxylapatite.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Biphosfonate
Intervention Description
External pins coated by biphosfonate.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Hydroxylapatit
Intervention Description
External pins coated by Hydroxylapatit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To evaluate the relative osseomechanical strength of a novel coated pin/screw in a clinical mode.
Description
To evaluate the relative osseomechanical strength of a novel coated pin/screw
Time Frame
2011-07-01-2012-02-01
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients which are diagnosed with arthr and needs an operation.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Orthopeadic Clinic Hospital
City
Hassleholm
ZIP/Postal Code
28125
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Bisphosphonate Coated Pins for Extern Fixation in Tibia Osteotomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs